Agenda 21 In Action In Australia Coming To A Town Near You
there is no copyright on any of my articles please share liberally
Agenda 21 in Action in Australia Coming to a Town near You
The demographics of Australia covers basic statistics, most populous cities, ethnicity and religion. The population of Australia is estimated to be 22,852,973 as of 9 March 2012. Australia is the 50th most populous country in the world. Its population is concentrated mainly in urban areas and is expected to exceed 28 million by 2030.
Australia's population has grown from an estimated population of about 350,000 at the time of British settlement in 1788 due to numerous waves of immigration during the period since. Also due to immigration, the European component of the population is declining as a percentage, as it is in many other Western countries.
Australia has scarcely more than two persons per square kilometre of total land area.
Australian children to be seized classified mentally ill and sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law.
Mental health patients in the past were cruelly treated by electro-shock therapy and full frontal lobe lobotomies. Today, these horrific forms of so-called mental health treatment are considered to be cruel relics of the past, but a new bill in Australia proposes that young children be given these treatments without parental consent, and even be permitted to undergo sterilization procedures without parental consent. The medical profession will also be granted the power to deem any child they so wish, as being classified a mental health patient needing parting from family and subjected to their cruel inhumane practices akin to medieval torture.
The Government of Western Australia's Mental Health Commission (WAMHC) has drafted a proposal for new mental health legislation that bypasses parental involvement in the mental health treatment process. It will allow children under age 18, and of any age, with making the decision about whether or not to be sterilized, or whether or not to have their brain tissue destroyed with psychosurgery procedures. If a "mental health professional" can convince children that they need such treatments for their own good, in other words, then Australia's youngest members of society will be open game for the eugenicist agenda.
Any sane person would consider this a sick plot, but it is all true and fully documented right in the WAMHC Mental Health Bill 2011, which you can access here: www.mentalhealth.wa.gov.au
All parents know that young children cannot make these decisions whilst being coerced by a medical professional and without the protection of the parents.
In the twisted minds of those who have seized positions of power all over the world, separating children from their parents and performing medical experiments on them in secret is a fully acceptable form of "medicine." This form of child abuse is exactly what WAMHC has proposed in its new mental health bill. Your children are not safe, look across the anglosphere and you will see that our children are under constant attack on many levels.
Pages 135 and 136 of the bill (pages 157 and 158 of the PDF) cover the issue of sterilization, explaining that if a psychiatrist decides that a child under 18 years of age "has sufficient maturity," he or she will be able to consent to sterilization without parental consent. It also goes on to say that parents will never be notified that the sterilization procedure occurred, as only the "Chief Psychiatrist" will be privy to this information.
It sounds like the euthanasia programs that emerged in Germany during the 1930s, when Nazis began secretly sterilizing individuals with physical or mental disabilities as part of "Operation T4" (fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/people/victims.htm). This eugenics program was later intensified, of course, when German physicians at Nazi death camps routinely sterilized men, women, and children, and later killed them, as part of the Nazi regime's utterly revolting ethnic cleansing experiments (www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/aumed.html).
Medical 'authorities' want to arbitrarily commit children to mental institutions, indefinitely restrain them, and force them to undergo brain-damaging procedures All of this gets worse, however, with other language scattered throughout the bill that would allow psychiatrists to involuntarily and indefinitely detain children who are "suspected" of having a mental illness. And during their detainment, such children can be forced to comply with drug, restraint, and seclusion protocols, as well as be forced to undergo permanently-damaging procedures like psychosurgery or ECT.
Worse, those who would be permitted to detain these children in the first place, deemed as "authorized mental health practitioners," are so loosely defined that virtually anyone could be authorized by the Chief Psychiatrist to abduct supposedly "mentally ill" children and commit them to mental institutions against their will and their parents' will.
Mental Health Commission is only accepting comments on the bill until March 9, 2012
The language in Australia's Mental Health Bill 2011 truly is horrifying, but not necessarily surprising. Similar efforts to undermine parental authority are taking place both in the U.S. and around the world.
Even though the date for comments has passed, we, the people of the planet,wherever we are should make our views known to the australian government as these laws will come to your backyard next. The elites are trying to demoralise us, attacking us with a million new laws,attacking our children, attacking humanity in an attempt to render us helpless.
California Gov. Jerry Brown, for instance, recently signed into law Senate Assembly Bill 499, which allows for children as young as age 12 to be vaccinated with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil, Hepatitis B, and various other sexually-transmitted disease (STD) vaccines without parental consent . This is another crime against us and our children.
This is sterilisation, this is medical genocide.
You can send your comments by email to:
You can send your comments by "snail" mail to:
GPO Box X2299
Perth Business Centre, W.A. 6847
If you live in Australia, you can also contact the Mental Health Minister, the Health Minister, and your local Member of Parliament by visiting: www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/memblist.nsf/WAllMembers
You all must realize that the major religious organizations have been co-opted for a very long time. The most glaring example is the Vatican, and along with Washington D.C. and the City of London (located within London proper) these locales are designated sovereign global entities and thus respectively represent the religious, military, and financial arms of the NWO. The major religious institutions have been used to control and pacify us and thus have kept us from greater truths about ourselves and the divine. The NWO very much want us to be paralyzed with fear and believe that we are helpless and must wait for divine assistance before we can turn things around - that is a very dangerous path as we must exercise our free will, educate others, and support examples of peaceful non-cooperation. For starters, suggestions for positive actions you can take can be found at thrivemovement dot com. Not very long ago the legal age of sexual consent within Vatican City was 12, yes twelve, and this is a place populated by priests bishops and religious figure heads who are supposedly celibate.
Gillard (PM of Australia) and Abbott were taken out a side door, the ABC said. At least 50 police were called to help escort them from the restaurant.Local media reported Gillard was visibly shaken, and stumbled during the encounter.Photographs showed her being dragged to a waiting vehicle by a group of at least seven security officers, losing a shoe in the process.
Video showed her being hustled into the vehicle, surrounded by security officers, some carrying shields, as protesters shouted, "Shame on you." The shoe was collected by protesters, who proclaimed it a trophy. On the tent embassy's Facebook page, according to the ABC, there was a picture of Gillard losing her shoe with the caption: "What is losing a shoe compared to losing an entire continent?" ....end
Now this protest was not pre-organized, not pre-arranged, it just happened because people came to know Gillard was in the area and this is how people will fight back, spontaneously, fight the evil in your back-yard, confront the evil, stand up to it. Each action locally in your community, collectively across the globe will make a difference and bring the changes..
All these so-called leaders are traitors to their nations every single one who is complying with the criminal NWO.
This is the reaction that awaits leaders around the world signed up to the NWO,
for the sickening policies they are implementing, if you think you are defenceless against the sheer avalanche of attack on humanity think again, they have planned all this from 50/60 years ago, they have worked dedicatedly to bring this reign of terror about in secret,the mainstream media has complied with the secrecy, we,the people were never informed until citizen journalism took up the torch to give us the information, millions of us have the information, it is your duty to share this information with others and to stand against evil, this has all been a continuation of WW2, it never really ended and 2012 is the year to stop the criminals.
Here another *study*
Ethicists okay infanticide: a sign of a sick world;
A recent report published in the Journal of Medical Ethics reveals a complete erosion of the line between good and evil. Infanticide, a heinous crime that many are attempting to eradicate in some cultures, is being promoted as morally permissible by two Italian “ethicists.”
Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Australia and Francesca Minerva of the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics in the U.K. argue that both fetuses and newborn infants, who they claim have no self-awareness or interests of their own, are not actual persons. Arguing from a supposed utilitarian “ethical” framework, Giubilini and Minerva assert that killing the child is permissible if it is in the best interest of the family involved. “After-birth abortion,” they call it. Sounds more like infanticide to me.
Read this paragraph well;
“Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus’ health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.”
So what would be next, killing 3 year olds, 6 year olds, anytime any place any where,at will! I think Alberto and Francesca should better put their *talents* to saving lives instead of writing this kind of infanticidal material to satisfy the depopulation agenda.
This is a global conversation for freedom,
here and now, no more time for sitting on the fence.